Considering the hexad of learning domains in the laboratory to address the overlooked aspects of chemistry education and fragmentary approach to research on student learning
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Considering the hexad of learning domains in the laboratory to address the overlooked aspects of chemistry education and fragmentary approach to research on student learning. / Agustian, Hendra Yusup.
I: Chemistry Education Research and Practice, Bind 23, Nr. 3, 2022, s. 518-530.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Considering the hexad of learning domains in the laboratory to address the overlooked aspects of chemistry education and fragmentary approach to research on student learning
AU - Agustian, Hendra Yusup
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - This article seeks to provide researchers in laboratory education, particularly those involved in the curriculum design and implementation of teaching laboratories at university level, with a conceptual framework and a working model for an integrated assessment of learning domains, by attending to a more holistic approach to learning in the laboratory. Prevailing learning theories suggest that the triad of cognitive, psychomotor, and affective domains should be addressed in order to warrant meaningful learning. In the research tradition of psychology and philosophy of mind, this triad also manifests as a concert of cognitive, conative, and affective domains. I argue that at least in the context of chemistry laboratory education, this is insufficient. The social and epistemic domains are often overlooked or dismissed altogether. Research in laboratory education may provide insight into the urgency and usefulness of integrating these domains into chemistry teaching and learning.
AB - This article seeks to provide researchers in laboratory education, particularly those involved in the curriculum design and implementation of teaching laboratories at university level, with a conceptual framework and a working model for an integrated assessment of learning domains, by attending to a more holistic approach to learning in the laboratory. Prevailing learning theories suggest that the triad of cognitive, psychomotor, and affective domains should be addressed in order to warrant meaningful learning. In the research tradition of psychology and philosophy of mind, this triad also manifests as a concert of cognitive, conative, and affective domains. I argue that at least in the context of chemistry laboratory education, this is insufficient. The social and epistemic domains are often overlooked or dismissed altogether. Research in laboratory education may provide insight into the urgency and usefulness of integrating these domains into chemistry teaching and learning.
U2 - 10.1039/d1rp00271f
DO - 10.1039/d1rp00271f
M3 - Journal article
VL - 23
SP - 518
EP - 530
JO - Chemistry Education Research and Practice
JF - Chemistry Education Research and Practice
SN - 1756-1108
IS - 3
ER -
ID: 260961359